Abstract

Background: Chronic clopidogrel therapy (CCT) has been shown to be beneficial in decreasing the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in coronary artery disease. However, some patients suffer an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) despite CCT. Objective : To assess the prognosis of patients suffering an ACS while on CCT compared to patients naive to clopidogrel. Method: Retrospective analysis of propensity matched cohorts of patients undergoing PCI for an ACS was performed. Patients under CCT before the ACS were matched 1:2 with patients not under CCT before the ACS. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year follow-up. A cohort of 2325 patients undergoing PCI for an ACS was studied. Among them, 256 patients were taking CCT for > 1 month at the time of the ACS and 2069 weren’t taking clopidogrel prior to the ACS. After propensity score matching 1:2, the 2 groups included, respectively, 84 and 168 patients. Results: Patients in both groups had similar rates of previous MI (no CCT vs CCT 47.6 vs 48.8%; p = 0.86) or PCI (40.5 vs 40.5%; p = 1). There was no difference in drug use on discharge between the 2 groups; in particular for thienopyridines (94 vs 96.4%; p = 0.6). At 1-year follow-up, patients under CCT before the ACS exhibited a worse prognosis than patients who were not under CCT prior to the ACS, with a higher rate of cardiac death and MI (14.2 vs 5.5%; p = 0.015). Conclusions: This study suggests that patients suffering an ACS while under CCT have a poor long-term prognosis, which could be linked to clopidogrel low response.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.