Abstract

Background: Despite an expanding armamentarium of devices, many patients with mitral regurgitation referred for transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement are not eligible to participate in the clinical trials or receive a commercially available device. We sought to understand the reasons why patients were excluded from receiving therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts, and correspondence related to patients referred to our tertiary valve center for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) or transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) between June 2016 to September 2019. Patients were screened for eligibility by our structural Heart Team for either TMVR or TMVr. If TMVR or TMVr was not offered the reason for screen failure was recorded and categorized. Results: Over the 3-year period, 564 patients were referred for TMVR/TMVr. Of these, 15.9% were determined to be eligible for and underwent surgical repair or replacement. 440 patients (78.0%) were considered for TMVR/TMVr. 92 patients (16.3%) underwent TMVR/TMVr. The majority of patients (348/564, 61.7%) ultimately did not undergo intervention (Panel A). The reasons for exclusion were clinical in 78%, issues related to patient preference of care delivery in 49% of patients, anatomical in 37% and futility in 25% of patients (Panel B). Conclusions: The majority of patients with mitral regurgitation referred for transcatheter mitral therapy are excluded for a variety of reasons. Clinical trials testing new transcatheter mitral valve devices should be encouraged to follow patients who are excluded to better understand optimal timing of intervention, address challenging anatomies, and ultimately improve penetrance of these novel therapies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call