Abstract

Background: Irrigated radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging in patient with severe systolic congestive heart failure due to large fluid load. The use of cryoballoon ablation in patients with low ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA class II-IV congestive heart failure has not been well described, and may benefit from the lack of fluid bolus and restoration of sinus rhythm. Method: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for systolic heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Single center retrospective review of 832 patients with AF ablation using Arctic Front Advance Cryoballoon (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was performed, and 188 patients has EF less than 35% (24 paroxysmal, 122 persistent, and 42 long-standing persistent, average EF 28%) was analyzed. Procedural tolerance, complications, and impact on congestive heart failure were reviewed over a 12 months follow up. Results: All 188 patients (Average age 68, LA size 5.8 cm) with systolic CHF and atrial fibrillation underwent successful pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and extra-pulmonary vein lesions sets applied using cryoballoon. Non-irrigated radiofrequency ablation was used in (22%) for cavo-tricuspid isthmus flutter ablation. Acute procedural success rate was 100% with length of hospitalization of 1.1 days. Average procedural time was 2.6 hours, and fluid infusion of 0.3 liters, no significant complications was noted. Atrial fibrillation burden was monitored by implantable pacemaker or defibrillator in 118 of 188 patients (63%), and others were monitoring via wearable looping recorders every 3 months. Significant AF burden (<10% atrial high rate burden) was observed in over 67% of the patients, and improvement CHF symptoms were reported in all of the patients with reduction of atrial fibrillation burden. Conclusions: Cryoballoon of AF in systolic CHF population is well tolerated with high procedural success rate and low complication rate. Significant clinical improvement of CHF class was observed in patient with reduction of atrial fibrillation burden. Ongoing collection of data is needed to quantify long-term benefit.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.