Abstract
Introduction: Epicardial coronary arteries are also a target for intramural amyloid deposits in cardiac amyloidosis beyond the myocardium. For patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy and some degree of stable chronic angina, the role of coronary revascularization has not been clearly shown to have additional benefits over medical management. In unstable angina and Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) population, isolated observations have painted a grimmer prognosis. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that wild-type ATTR-CA patients with NSTEMI undergoing Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) had poor outcomes. We sought to establish their prevalence and uncover the determinants of these outcomes. Methods: A five-year retrospective inquiry of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 on all the patients admitted with a matching diagnosis to the ICD-10 code of interest. Results: Over the five-year span of our observation, about 1,116,170 patients were admitted to the hospital in the US with an NSTE-ACS diagnosis, of which 99% underwent PCI during the same hospitalization (1,116,065). Among the latter 1,505 patients (1%) had ATTR-CA. The most represented demographics in that subpopulation were men (69%), elderly about 74 years old on average (80%), and Whites (60%). The cumulative mortality rate among the ATTR-CA PCI group was higher (18%) than the general NSTE-ACS PCI (14%). Factors associated with survival at hospital discharge were female sex (p-value 0.008), and black race (p-value 0.019). Meanwhile, Asian race (p-value 0.0001), being in a teaching hospital (p-value 0.0001), medium to large size hospital (p-value 0.0001) were harbingers of poor outcomes including death (18%), prolonged hospitalization (about 9.5 days), and higher healthcare costs (about $127,319). Conclusions: PCI has mortality benefits in STEMI and unstable CAD. However, in the ATTR-CA with unstable CAD, this might not be the case as seen with the staggering 28% risk increase in mortality rates in our study. Percutaneous revascularization in wild-type ATTR-CA deserves its own category when clinicians are weighing the benefits and a multidisciplinary approach should be preferred.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.