Abstract 164: Variation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Metrics for Nationally Certified versus Self-Attested Comprehensive Stroke Centers in the Florida Stroke Registry

Abstract

Background: The Florida Stroke Act set criteria for comprehensive stroke centers (CSC). Hospitals could be certified by a national agency (The Joint Commission (TJC), Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP)) or could self-attest as fulfilling CSC criteria. This study aimed to evaluate whether nationally certified (NC) and self-attested hospitals (SA) have similar quality of care in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: The study population included AIS cases from 37 CSCs (74% of FL CSCs) in the FL-Stroke Registry, a multi-hospital registry using Get With the Guidelines-Stroke data from Jan 2013-Dec 2018. Hospital and patient level characteristics and stroke metrics were evaluated using unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, race and NIH) analyses. Results: 13 NC-CSCs with 32,061 AIS cases and 24 SA-CSCs with 46,363 AIS cases were included. NCs were larger, with younger patients (71 (60-81) vs 72 (61-82)) and more severe strokes (median NIH; 5 vs 4, NIH ≥ 16; 15.4 vs 11.9% p <.0001). Overall IV tPA utilization (15.4% vs 13.9% p <.0001) and EVT treatment (9.8% vs 7.3% p <.0001) were better in NC CSCs. Median door to CT (23 min (11-76) vs 30 (12-75) p <.001) and door to needle time (38 min (27-51) vs 43(30-56) p <.001) were faster in NC CSCs. In adjusted analysis those arriving to NC by 3 hrs were more likely to get tPA in extended 3-4.5-hour window (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.10, 2.47 p =.01). Conclusion: Among FL-Stroke Registry CSCs, AIS performance and treatment measures are superior in NC CSC when compared to SA CSCs. These findings have crucial implications for stroke systems of care in Florida and supported recent change in legislation regarding CSC center certification.