Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the active duty (AD) military population has not been previously reported. Hypothesis: We postulate that PVI is an efficacious and safe treatment for young AD service members with AF. Methods: AD military personnel with AF who underwent PVI from 2004 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in four age groups (group 1, n=26, 18 to 27 years; group 2, n=38, 28 to 37 years; group 3, n=28, 38 to 49 years; group 4, n=12, ≥50 years). Primary endpoints were (1) PVI procedural efficacy defined as no or rare AF recurrence (<6 episodes) 12 months after last PVI with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and (2) procedure-related adverse events and complications. Results: 104 personnel (mean age 35.6+9 years, 84.6% paroxysmal AF, mean LVEF 60.2+6%, 19.2% maintained on AAD after PVI) underwent 142 PVI procedures with a mean follow up of 55.8+47 months. Procedural efficacy was attained in 96.2% of group 1, 78.9% of group 2, 75.0% of group 3, and 66.7% of group 4 (P=0.004, Figure 1). Freedom from AF was reached in 80.3% of group 1, 55.3% of group 2, 46.4% of group 3, 41.7% of group 4 (P=0.02). AADs were maintained in 11.5% of group 1, 21.0% of group 2, 14.3% of group 3, 41.7% of group 4 (P=0.144) and there was no difference in AF recurrence rates between those with AADs and those without (P=0.091). LVEF <50% trended towards being a significant predictor of AF recurrence (OR, 7; 95% CI, 0.75-65; P=0.051). Complications occurred in only 4 (3.8%) cases (pulmonary vein stenosis, cardiac tamponade, arteriovenous fistula) with no complications in the youngest group. Conclusions: This study suggests that PVI is an effective and safe therapy for younger military personnel with AF desiring to decrease their individual AF burden.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call