Abstract

Introduction: For select patients, support with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be used as a bridge to recovery of ventricular function. While rates of explant are low, improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on LVAD support is more common. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that LVAD recipients whose LVEF recovers have better outcomes compared to those whose LVEF does not recover. Methods: Data from INTERMACS was merged with the Duke Echo Lab Database for all patients who underwent LVAD implantation between March 2006 and June 2017 at Duke Hospital. 286 patients with a continuous flow LVAD also had serial echocardiograms performed. Based on our prior work in HFrEF, we defined recovery as an LVEF >= 40%. INTERMACS data and manual chart review was used to identify hospitalizations for recurrent heart failure (HF), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and pump thrombosis along with mortality. Results: 9.8% of patients had an LVEF >= 40% within 2 years of implant. LVEF recovery was associated with female gender [53.6% vs 21.7%. p < 0.001], lower serum Cr prior to implant [1.30 mg/dL (IQR 1.00-1.60) vs 1.40 mg/dL (IQR 1.10-1.90), p = 0.05], and absence of an ICD [53.6% vs 79.8%, p = 0.002]. Within 1-year of the follow-up echo with the highest reported LVEF, patients whose LVEF was >= 40% had a reduced incidence for a composite of hospitalizations for HF, GIB, pump thrombosis, and mortality [12.8% vs 39.8%, p = 0.013] as well as reduced rate of recurrent composite endpoint events [4.7 vs. 49 events per 100 person years, p = 0.020]. Of the individual endpoints, subjects with an LVEF >= 40% had a lower, but non-significant, incidence of hospitalizations for HF [0% vs 10%, p = 0.122] and GIB [4.8% vs 18.2% p = 0.081]. Importantly, those who went on to recover their LVEF did not have a lower rate of recurrent composite endpoint events between the time of implant and time to follow-up echo (88 events per 100 person years in the recovery group vs 53 per 100 person years in the non-recovery group, p =0.052), suggesting that recovery of LVEF is temporally related to the improvement in outcomes. Conclusions: Recovery of LVEF on LVAD support in not uncommon. Strategies to facilitate recovery have the potential to improve outcomes of LVAD recipients beyond pump explant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call