Abstract 15376: Candidacy and Fate of Right Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Abstract

Objective: There are no current guidelines for risks and benefits of cardiac surgery for patients with right heart failure (RHF). In this study, we analyzed pre-operative RHF variables aiming to assess candidacy for surgery and impact of tricuspid intervention. Methods: We retrospectively identified 522 patients with severe (+3 or more) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) who underwent cardiac surgery between 01/2007 and 01/2014 . The mean follow up was 4.7 years (± 4.3 years). Cluster analysis was performed using preoperative RHF clinical and hemodynamics variables, and outcomes after surgery were assessed. Results: Cluster analysis divided the cohort into three distinct clusters representing different phenotypes of patients with RHF-associated TR (cluster 1: 220 patient, cluster 2: 224 patients, cluster 3: 78 patients). Cluster I had highest concomitant left-sided valve procedure (72% mitral valve surgery, p<.0001) with best RV function (fractional area change % 35 ± 13, p=.0002). Cluster II had highest MELD score (14 ± 4, p<.0001), creatinine (1.4 ± 0.6, p<.0001), and worst RV function (fractional area change % 30 ± 12, p=.0002). Cluster III had the most dilated right heart with right atrial area of 42 ± 14 mm, p<.0001 and RV area in diastole 42 ± 10 mm, p<.0001. Survival was best in Cluster I followed by Cluster III while worst in Cluster II (70%, 59%, and 29% at 8-years, respectively), Figure 1. Recurrent TR was highest in Cluster III, followed by Cluster II while least in Cluster I at 10-years (9%, 8%, and 5%, respectively). Conclusions: Cluster analysis of RHF identified three distinct groups of patients presenting for cardiac surgery. Pre-operative RV dysfunction was associated with worse clinical outcomes and need careful assessment before surgery. Pre-operative right heart dilation was associated with recurrent TR for which more aggressive tricuspid repair or even replacement might be considered.