Abstract
Background: Current national and international guidelines recommend the use of oral and/or intravenous (IV) acetylsalicylic acid as an alternative mode of application in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are unable to swallow. However, acetylsalicylic acid IV has not been investigated in clinical trials and is not available everywhere. Aim: The primary objective of the present open-label, randomized, verum-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study was to demonstrate superiority of 250 or 500 mg acetylsalicylic acid IV treatment over oral treatment with 300 mg acetylsalicylic acid tablet to inhibit thromboxane A2 release at 5 minutes after a single dose of study drug in subjects with ACS with and without ST elevation. Methods: Acetylsalicylic acid naive patients with ACS were randomized into three groups to receive a single dose of acetylsalicylic acid either 300 mg orally, 250 or 500 mg intravenously. ThromboxaneA2 release (measured as the stable serum metabolite thromboxane B2), platelet aggregation and prostacyclin levels were measured 5 and 20 minutes after study drug administration. Patients were followed for 30 days for clinical events. Results: A total of 270 patients were randomized. The results of the primary and secondary endpoints are given in the table. Conclusion: The administration of 250 or 500 mg acetylsalicylic acid intravenously compared to 300 mg orally is associated with a faster and more effective inhibition with respect to thromboxane generation and inhibition of platelet aggregation, without any increase in bleeding complications. Therefore, i.v. administration of acetylsalicylic acid should be preferred in the acute management of patients with ACS.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.