Abstract

Objective: We aimed to clarify the differences in the significance of the ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea), [Ed/Ea=(E/e’)/(0.9 х systolic blood pressure)], a relative index of left atrial (LA) pressure overload, in relation to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level on prognosis between patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with and without atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We studied 297 HFpEF patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (sinus rhythm/AF: 192/105). Blood testing and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. All-cause mortality was evaluated at >1 year after discharge. Results: During a median follow-up of 626 days, 47 patients (sinus rhythm/AF: 30/17) had all-cause mortality. In the subgroup with sinus rhythm, but not AF, Ed/Ea was significantly higher in patients with than without all-cause mortality. In a multivariate Cox hazard analysis, Ed/Ea was significantly associated with all-cause mortality independent of NT-proBNP in patients with sinus rhythm, but not with AF. Among patients with higher NT-proBNP levels, the effect of higher Ed/Ea on prognosis was prominent only in those with sinus rhythm (p=0.037). Conclusions: Ed/Ea provides additional prognostic information to serum NT-proBNP level for predicting all-cause mortality only in HFpEF patients with sinus rhythm. The prognostic risk factors differed between elderly HFpEF patients with and without AF.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call