Abstract 13514: Gender-Stratified Difference in the Association Between Coronary Artery Calcium and Incident Peripheral Artery Disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery calcium score (CACs) measured by non-contrast cardiac CT has a strong correlation with coronary atherosclerotic burden. Although CACs predicts incident coronary heart disease, its gender-specific association with incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) is not clear. Methods: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) is a prospective population-based cohort consisting of 6814 men and female free of overt cardiovascular disease at enrollment. In this study we included MESA participants with baseline CACs and at least one ankle brachial index (ABI) measured at follow up exams. We excluded participants with baseline ABI≤ 0.9 or> 1.4. Incident PAD was defined as a follow up ABI≤ 0.9 and decline of ≥15%. Multivariable logistic regression models were deployed to evaluate the association between baseline CACs and incident PAD in female and male. Results: The mean age (SD) was 61.29 (9.96) years and 52.6% (3013/5725) were female. Female had lower baseline ABI [1.10 (0.08) vs 1.15 (0.09); p < 0.001]. Over a median (IQR) of 9.23 (8.22-9.60) years, 113(4%) female and 85(3%) male developed PAD. Every one unit increase in log (CACs+1) was associated with 1.11-fold higher odds of incident PAD in male (p=0.001). This association remained significant after adjustment for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factor and baseline ABI. Male participants with CACs>300 showed 1.94-fold higher odds of incident PAD compared to participant with CACs=0 (p=0.005). In female there was no statistically significant association between CACs and incident PAD in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Baseline CACs is associated with future PAD independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in male participants of a multi-ethnic cohort. Disclaimer statement: The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institutes of Health; or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.