Abstract 13427: Extracellular Vesicles Improve Heart Function Without Inducing the Generation of New Cardiomyocytes

Abstract

Introduction: Extracellular Vesicles (EV) recapitulate the benefits of cell therapy for heart repair. Their mechanism of action remains unsettled. Hypothesis: EV may contribute to heart repair by de novo cardiogenesis. Methods: To answer this question, we used 2 bi-transgenic mouse models: the fate-mapping MerCreMer/ZEG and the Mosaic Analysis With Double Markers (MADM). Myocardial infarction was induced by permanent coronary artery ligation. Those with a LVEF ≤ 45% were treated 3 weeks later with EV (from human iPS-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells; 10x10 9 particles) or PBS, injected under echo guidance in the peri-infarcted area (MerCreMer/ZEG: n=15/group and MADM: n=6/group). To track endogenous cardiomyocyte (CM) proliferation, we used EdU labeling in MerCreMer/ZEG delivered by osmotic pumps implanted for 7-10 days post-injection and biphoton microscopy in MADM models. Cardiac function was assessed 4-6 weeks after injection by echocardiography and MRI, blinded to treatment group. Hearts were then subjected to histological and transcriptomic analyses (qPCR and genome-wide microarray). Results: In PBS controls, EF remained stable over time in MerCreMer/ZEG mice and decreased from 34.5% ± 6.0% to 30.7% ± 7.5% in MADM mice by the end of the study. Conversely, EV injections increased EF from 32.1% ± 9.5% to 36.1% ± 7.45 % in MerCreMer/ZEG and from 36.2 %± 8.7% to 40.5% ± 8.9% in MADM mice. A significant difference in the change from baseline was found between EV and controls: 20.7% ± 10.5 % (p=0.048) and 28.0% ± 11.0 %, (p=0.045) for MerCreMer/ZEG and MADM groups, respectively. This improvement was confirmed by MRI in MerCreMer/ZEG mice (p=0.05). Improvement in EF was unrelated to the appearance of new CM, as shown by the absence of difference in TnT+/EdU+/GFP+ cell numbers and the lack of activation of the YAP/TAZ pathway between control and EV groups. However, EV reduced infarct size by 11.9% ± 5.75% (p=0.04), which was accompanied by decreased expression of 4 pro-fibrotic genes (Col1a2, Col3a1, Lox, Col1a2 by qPCR) in heart tissue and a 2.13X overexpression of the anti-fibrotic miRNA 133a-1 compared to controls (n=3/group; p=0.001). Conclusions: EV likely improve cardiac function by modulation of fibrosis rather than by de novo cardiogenesis.