Abstract

Introduction: Implantation of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRC) is a promising novel strategy to augment angiogenesis and blood perfusion recovery in ischemic diseases with no other therapeutic option. However, there is a clinical concern underlying therapeutic angiogenesis that implantation of ADRC may promote tumor growth and metastasis via remote angiogenesis. Accordingly, we tested whether therapeutic angiogenesis with ADRC against hindlimb ischemia (HLI) would affect remote tumor growth and angiogenesis in a tumor-bearing mouse ischemic hindlimb model. Methods and results: B16F10-Luc (murine melanoma cells expressing luciferase, 1x106 cells/animal) were implanted to C57BL/6J mice’s (male, 8-10 weeks old, n=10) back. Mice were subjected to unilateral HLI surgery one day after tumor implantation. Then, mice were randomly assigned to the control group or the ADRC group (n=5 for each). ADRC (1x106 cells/animal) or PBS were implanted/injected into ischemic hindlimb muscles one day after the surgery. Blood perfusion recovery in HLI by laser Doppler perfusion imaging system and tumor size by a caliper were measured every week up to 21 days after surgery. At POD 21, tumor weight and luciferase activity in primary tumors obtained by in vivo bioluminescence imaging system were also evaluated. Immunohistochemistry by CD31 or LYVE1 staining was performed to detect feeder arteries or outflow lymphatic vessels in tumors. The results demonstrated that better blood perfusion recovery and more capillary density in HLI was observed in the ADRC group than in the control group (p<0.05, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of tumor volume (p=0.95), tumor weight (p=0.88) and luciferase activity of primary tumor (p=0.92) between those two groups. No sign of distant metastasis was detected by macroscopic and pathological examination, and by in vivo bioluminescence imaging system in both groups. Further study also revealed that capillary density of peritumoral blood vessels or lymphatic vessels was not augmented by ADRC implantation into remote HLI. Conclusions: Our data indicated that therapeutic angiogenesis with ADRC implantation against HLI did not promote remote tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call