Abstract 12948: Low Use of Statins in People With Type 2 Diabetes With or Without Cardiovascular Disease: A Capture Post Hoc Analysis

Abstract

Background and aim: The association between LDL levels, CVD and the benefits of statin use are well established. The CAPTURE study estimated the contemporary (2019) global prevalence of CVD and medication use in adults with type 2 diabetes across 13 countries. This post hoc analysis assessed serum lipid status and statin use in people with type 2 diabetes without CVD (NoCVD), with established CVD, and atherosclerotic CVD (AsCVD, a subgroup of CVD). Methods: CAPTURE was a multinational, cross-sectional and non-interventional study. Participant information on CVD status, serum lipid profiles, and medication use were ascertained during single routine clinical visit in primary or specialist setting. This analysis included people who had data on serum LDL-C and lipid-lowering therapies. LDL-C targets were set at <100 mg/dL (<2.6 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L) for people without and with CVD/AsCVD, respectively according to the ADA 2019 guidelines. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: The CAPTURE study enrolled 9823 people aimed to be representative of the general type 2 diabetes population. Most (>80%) had blood LDL-C information. Mean serum levels of lipids varied across 3 groups. (Table) The overall use of any statin was 38% in the NoCVD, 53% in CVD, and 55% in AsCVD groups. In those with documented serum LDL-C levels, 48% in the NoCVD, 67% in CVD, and 66% in AsCVD groups were above LDL-C targets with statin use of 34%, 57%, and 60%, respectively in these participants. Overall, the use of ezetimibe was 3-8% in all the groups and usually in combination with a statin. PCSK9 inhibitors use was <0.1% and used only in participants with CVD. (Table) Conclusion: In conclusion, this CAPTURE post hoc analysis found that two-thirds of people with CVD and AsCVD had LDL-C levels above recommendations and only around 60% of them were on statins. Intolerability of statins might partly explain this lower than expected statin use.