Abstract 124: Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in the Early Period After the Neurologic Index Event - Results From the German Quality Assurance Registry on > 50,000 Patients

Abstract

Objectives: Current guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should be performed within two weeks after the neurologic index event in patients with a 50-99% symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (sCS). Safety of early CEA and early carotid artery stenting (CAS) within those two weeks remains unclair. This study aims to analyze the safety of CEA and CAS in sCS in Germany. Methods: By German law all extracranial carotid procedures have to be documented prospectively in a nationwide quality assurance registry. We analysed data on 56,336 CEAs (68% male, mean age 71 years (SD ± 9.6) and 4,726 CAS (68% male, median age 70 years (SD ± 9.8) treated between 2009-2014 for sCS. The patient cohort was divided into four time interval groups (I: 0-2 days, II: 3-7 days, III: 8-14 days and IV: 14-180 days respectively). Primary endpoint was the combined in-hospital stroke and mortality rate. We excluded all emergency CEAs (stroke-in-evolution, acute occlusion) and all procedures for recurrent carotid stenosis from this analysis. We performed chi-squared tests and a multivariable multilevel Poisson-regression analysis to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RR). Results: The procedural combined stroke and mortality rate was 3.0% (157 of 5198)/6.0% (33 of 550) in group I, 2.5% (480 of 19,117)/4.4% (70 of 1579) in group II, 2.6% (427 of 16,205)/2.4% (30 of 1244) in group III and 2.3% (370 of 15,759)/3.0% (40 of 1344) in group IV respectively. In the multivariable regression analysis the time interval was no independent risk factor for patients treated by CEA. However, CAS was associated with a decreased periprocedural risk when performed 8-14 days (group III) after the index event vs. group I (0-2 days) (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.79). No significance was found comparing time group II vs. I (RR 0.80, 95% CI0.52-1.24) and IV vs. I (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.05). Conclusion: Time interval between neurologic event and CEA has no significant influence on the perioperative stroke and mortality rate. CAS was associated with a higher risk when performed early. In accordance with the guidelines, CEA remains to be the treatment of choice in the early period after cerebral ischemia.