Abstract
Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large‐vessel occlusion. However, the extent of its benefits in elderly populations remains uncertain, as most landmark trials on MT have focused on younger individuals. This single‐center case series aims to shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of MT in higher age groups, particularly within the context of low‐ or middle‐income countries. Methods Between January 2018 and June 2023, we conducted a chart review of five patients aged ≥80 years who underwent MT for stroke. The study analyzed the patients' premorbid comorbidities, time to treatment, revascularization rates, procedural complications, mortality, and 90‐day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Results The five cases included individuals aged between 81 and 94 years. Among them, two had mild baseline disability (mRS score 0‐1), and three had moderate baseline disability (mRS score 2‐4). Upon admission, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ranged from 14 to 24. Three of the patients received pre‐thrombectomy intravenous thrombolysis with Alteplase and subsequently underwent MT within 4 to 7 hours of symptom onset. Successful recanalization (TICI score 2b‐3) was achieved in all five patients. However, two patients developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post‐thrombectomy, and one of them succumbed to the complication. Three out of the four discharged patients attained favorable clinical outcomes with a 90‐day mRS score of 0‐2 or equivalent to their prestroke disability. Conclusion Our case series suggests that elderly individuals can potentially achieve favorable functional outcomes after MT. Nevertheless, this potential is influenced by stroke severity and the success of the treatment. As the elderly population, including octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians, is expected to grow in the future, cautious patient selection should be exercised when considering thrombectomy in this age group. Further research comparing endovascular and conventional treatments in the elderly is imperative to inform better clinical decisions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.