Abstract 11957: Physical Training Augmented With Whole Body Electronic Muscle Stimulation is Superior to Conventional Training Alone in Healthy Subjects, a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Introduction: Physical activity is protective against cardiovascular (CV) disease and mortality, yet more than 25% of adults do not perform any regular exercise. Whole body electronic muscle stimulation (WB-EMS) is a novel FDA-approved device used for physical training that simultaneously stimulates all major muscle groups using percutaneous electrical impulse transmission during exercise. Preliminary studies demonstrated increased muscle mass, reduced fat mass, and improved functional capacity in elderly individuals who trained with WB-EMS. We evaluated the effects of training with WB-EMS on measures of CV health. Methods: Healthy adults were randomized to physical training with versus without WB-EMS for one 20-minute session each week for 16 weeks. Participants wore a specifically designed vest and arm and leg straps connected to the WB-EMS device (Miha Bodytec, Germany). Biphasic electrical stimulation was delivered through the vest and straps (4 sec on, 4 sec off) at a frequency that elicited a score of 5-6 on the Borg perceived exertion scale when each major muscle group was stimulated. Individuals randomized to no WB-EMS wore the same equipment but received no stimulation. Sessions were provided by trainers certified in WB-EMS training and consisted of a fixed protocol of simple exercises such as squats and lunges. Temporal changes in measures of CV health were compared between groups. Results: Forty-one individuals were recruited between 02/2021 and 02/2022 (n=24 WB-EMS, n=17 no WB-EMS; mean age 35.9±11.2 yrs; 61.3% females; median BMI 24.3 (21.8, 28.1) kg/m 2 . After 16 weeks there were significant and favorable differences in the intervention group compared to controls in waist: hip ratio (-1.2 cm vs. 0.9, p=0.05); total cholesterol (-1.1 mg/kg vs. 14.2 mg/kg, p=0.02); anaerobic threshold (68.2% vs. 30.8%, p=0.03); breathing efficiency (VE/VCO2: -10.36 vs -7.38, p=0.01); and peripheral endothelial function, measured with reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (-0.009 vs. -0.29, p=0.06). Conclusions: Once weekly training with WB-EMS yielded more favorable changes in CV biomarkers compared to conventional training alone in healthy adults, and thus may offer an effective and time-efficient method of physical training.