Abstract

Introduction: Over the last decade substantial efforts have been aimed at improving acceptability of pacemakers and ICDs in the MRI. Many labs have evaluated the construction, safety, efficacy, reproducibility and more recently, clinical impact value in such legacy devices. In parallel, there has been extensive effort by major vendors to develop safe MRI compatible devices. To date, there remains few reasons for hesitation in universal use of any PM/ICD in the MRI bore. However, mixing vendor leads and generators remains a major hurdle limiting MRI usage. Hypothesis: Mixed leads and generators has no distinct safety signal from common devices; whether CIED or non-CIED. Methods: We undertook a retrospective DB analysis to determine safety signals in those pts possessing mixed vendor leads and devices. Comparisons of impedance, amplitude, threshold and battery voltage and patient safety etc. were performed. Results: Pts from 5/2010 to 5/2022, representing 1739 pts with CIED (81%) and non-CIED (19%) underwent an MRI in a dedicated CMR Lab. The majority of the mixed cohort were obtained from the non-CIED population (>98%), not having need for generator replacement. Accordingly, 11% of these underwent an MRI to include: 73% neurologic, 8% orthopedic and 19% cardiac indications. In comparison of safety signals between standard and mixed lead/generator implants, there were no differences in any implant parameters either pre-MRI study or post-interrogation (p=NS). Similarly, there were no peri-MRI pt events or reported in the 30d and 180d post-MRI scan (p=NS). Importantly, especially for EP considerations, there were no added complications to interrogations. Moreover, utilizing a similar approach to manipulation of MRI parameters for maximum safety intrinsic to dependent/non-dependent PM status was employed regardless of lead/generator configuration yielding no complications. Conclusions: Employing a similar approach to MRI scanning in those pts with mixed vendor lead/generator configurations yielded no difference in a multitude of safety, interrogation, devices and efficacy parameters. This reassurance suggests, despite inherent incompatibility concerns between vendors while in the magnetic field, no such fears are truly warranted.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.