Abstract
Abstract Alterations in the MET oncogene occurs across a broad range of tumor indications. Amplification or mutations in MET lead to increased activity of downstream pathways including PI3K and MAPK, eventually resulting in tumor formation. Several small molecule inhibitors are currently in clinical trials, including the selective inhibitor Savolitinib (HMP-504, Volitinib, AZD6094), which shows single digit nanomolar activity in MET-amplified cell lines. Newly emerging data suggest mutations in MET causing complete skipping of Exon 14 occur in approximately 4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and are more rare in other indications [1, 2]. MET exon 14 skipping mutations were shown to be mutually exclusive from EGFRm, ALK and KRAS and can occur in the context of MET gene amplification [3]. Exon 14 harbors the CBL binding site (Y1003), which is critical for receptor degradation after binding of its ligand, HGF, and suppression of downstream signaling events. Clinical trial results with less potent, pan RTK inhibitors Crizotinib (31nM GI50 vs 3nM for Savolitinib) and Cabozantinib show promising early results, but fall short in long term responses. Therefore, better therapies targeting MET are needed. Human cell line models with Exon 14 deletions are rare. Therefore, we used engineered cell lines to test the effect of Savolitinib on these mutations. To do this, we expressed MET-Y1003F mutants in NIH-3T3 and HEK293T cells. We found that Savolitinib potently inhibited phospho-MET in both models expressing this mutant (100% phospho-MET inhibition). In addition, we tested whether or not Savolitinib could inhibit HGF-dependent signaling and growth of a NSCLC cell line, NCI-H596. In the presence of FBS (10%), Savolitinib had no effect on the growth rate of these cells, however was highly efficient at blocking HGF-dependent growth in the absence of FBS. To test the effect of this mutation in the background of amplification, we also tested the gastric cancer cell line Hs746T, which harbors exon 14 skipping in addition to MET amplification. Savolitinib was highly efficacious at blocking the growth of this cell line. Future studies are aimed at looking at the in vivo effect of Savolitinib targeting exon 14 mutants. These data provide a platform of evidence for using Savolitinib to target exon 14 mutant MET in patients. 1. Paik, P.K., et al., Response to MET inhibitors in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinomas harboring MET mutations causing exon 14 skipping. Cancer Discov, 2015. 5(8): p. 842-9. 2. Frampton, G.M., et al., Activation of MET via diverse exon 14 splicing alterations occurs in multiple tumor types and confers clinical sensitivity to MET inhibitors. Cancer Discov, 2015. 5(8): p. 850-9. 3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N., Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature, 2014. 511(7511): p. 543-50. Citation Format: Evan Barry, Elizabeth Maloney, Ryan Henry, Alexandra Borodovsky, Edwin Clark, Melanie Frigault, Michael Zinda, Celina D’Cruz. Targeting MET Exon 14 mutations with the selective small molecule inhibitor Savolitinib. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1150.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have