Abstract

Introduction: Gender disparities in the utilization of catheter-directed thrombolytic (CDT) therapy vs. systemic thrombolytic (ST) therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have not been studied before. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2018, we identified all adult patients with acute PE who received any thrombolytic therapy. The primary outcome was the utilization of CDT vs. ST therapy in females compared to males. The secondary outcome was the mortality in females compared to males in all patients of acute PE who received any thrombolytic therapy. Results: We identified 45,950 patients who received CDT or ST therapy. The mean age was 59.7 years in females vs. 59 in males (p-value - .03). Males were more likely to have saddle PE (33% vs. 29%, p-value < .01) and less likely to have vasopressor use (3% vs. 5%, p-value < .01). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Females were less likely to have CDT vs. ST therapy on adjusted analysis (AOR - 0.85, p-value < .01), as shown in Table 2. Females also had 27% higher in-hospital mortality than males in the entire cohort who received any thrombolytic therapy even after adjustment for age, race, comorbidities, and hospital factors (AOR - 1.27, p-value < .01). CDT was associated with a 58% lower risk of in-hospital mortality than systemic thrombolytic therapy in the adjusted model (AOR - 0.42, p-value < .01). Conclusion: Gender disparities exist in the utilization of CDT in patients of acute PE who receive thrombolytic therapy, with lower utilization in females than males, despite significantly reduced in-hospital mortality associated with CDT vs. ST therapy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.