Abstract

Introduction: Ventricular pacing can cause dysfunction but how the lead is anchored to the myocardium has not been studied. We evaluated patterns of regional and global ventricular function in patients with a ventricular pacemaker or defibrillator using cine cardiac CT (CCT). Methods: This was a single center retrospective study of patients with a ventricular pacemaker or defibrillator who underwent a cine CCT from September 2020 to June 2021. Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) were assessed in relation to lead insertion site (sew-on vs screw-in) and pacing activity (active vs. inactive). Results: A total of 122 ventricular lead insertion sites were analyzed in 43 patients (53% male, median age 20 years, range 3-57 years). Thirteen patients (30%) had palliated single ventricle physiology, twenty-nine patients had congenital heart disease with biventricular circulation (67%), and one patient had a structurally normal heart (2%). RWMAs were present in 51/122 (42%) lead insertion sites among 23/43 (53%) patients. The prevalence of a lead insertion site associated RWMA was higher with active pacing (54% vs 19%; p < 0.001) and highest for active epicardial sew-on sites ( Figure 1 ). RWMAs were not associated with position of the insertion site relative to the chest wall (p = 0.85) or the distance between the two heads of a bipolar lead (p = 0.23). Patients with lead insertion site associated RWMAs had a lower systemic ventricular ejection fraction (mean of 37.5% vs 52.5%, p < 0.001) compared to those without a RWMA. Conclusions: Pacemaker lead insertion site RWMAs are common and associated with systemic ventricular dysfunction. The mechanism and clinical significance of this regional and global dysfunction warrant further study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call