Abstract 10950: Prognostic Utility of Left Atrio-Ventricular Deformation Analysis in Heart Failure Patients Underwent Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Abstract

Introduction: Left atrial (LA) adverse remodeling is a prognostic marker in patients with heart failure. Although left ventricular (LV) deformation analysis by speckle tracking method has been shown as a useful predictive marker after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the prognostic impact of baseline left atrio-ventricular functional deterioration on the outcome of patients underwent CRT implantation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a combination of LV and LA deformation assessments by speckle-tracking strain is of additive prognostic value in patients with CRT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 71 participants who received CRT implantation in the clinical guidelines. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was defined as averaged strain from 3 apical views. LA strain (LAS) was calculated as the average strain using apical two- and four-chamber views. The endpoint was composite outcome of death, hospitalization due to worsening HF for 5 years after CRT implantation. Results: Out of 71 patients aged 68 ± 11 years with 162±24ms of QRS duration and 30±8% of LV ejection fraction, 40 patients (56%) met the endpoint. The patients were stratified using median value of LAS (-15%) and GLS (-8%). LAS and GCS remained significantly associated with poor outcome after adjusting for LVEF (LAS hazard ratio, 0.92; p<0.001; GLS hazard ratio, 1.15; p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the subgroup of patients with both lower median values of LAS and GLS had the worst outcomes over 5 years (Figure, Log-rank, p = 0.008). In the sequential Cox model, predictive value of baseline LV ejection fraction (χ2 = 4.9) was improved by the addition of GLS (χ2 = 9.2, p = 0.037), and further improved by the addition of LAS (χ2 = 15.8, p = 0.005). C-statistics also improved from 0.62 to 0.73. Conclusions: Baseline left atrio-ventricular functional deterioration by deformation analysis were significantly associated with poor outcome after CRT implantation.