Abstract
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical complication to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with short-term mortality rates exceeding 40%. However, the definition of CS varies between trials, which may comprise interstudy comparability. Aim: The aim of the current study was to review differences and similarities of CS definitions used in randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing patients with AMI-related CS. Methods: From the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE we identified 19 AMI-related CS trials comprising a total of 2674 unique patients with CS. Results: Seven trials investigated left ventricular assist devices, eight investigated medical treatments, three percutaneous coronary interventions, and one trial investigated targeted temperature management. The inclusion criteria, baseline hemodynamics, endpoints and mortality varied markedly between trials. Hypotension was the most frequent inclusion criterion (17 (90%) trials), with a systolic blood pressure value <90mmHg combined with vasopressor use as the most frequent definition, Figure. Twelve (63%) trials had signs of impaired end-organ perfusion as an inclusion criterion and 10 (53%) signs of impaired cardiovascular function most frequently low cardiac index and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Ten (53%) trials included patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest, three trials excluded cardiac arrest-patients whereas six trials did not state whether cardiac arrest was an exclusion criterion. Mortality ranged from 8 % to 73%. Conclusions: RCTs of AMI-related CS show marked heterogeneity in inclusion criteria and outcomes potentially hampering interstudy comparability. Consensus criteria for CS appear needed for future selection of patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.