Abstract 1040: Evaluation of blood collection tube’s performance for analysis of liquid biopsies by flow and mass cytometry

Abstract

Abstract The detection of liquid biopsies, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have demonstrated promise as non-invasive assays for monitoring response to therapy for patients with cancer. While ctDNA cannot predict transcriptomic and proteomic changes in response to therapy, we can measure direct cell surface antigen and gene expression changes in CTCs. In pediatric settings, blood samples are often collected from multi-institutional trials. Therefore, to translate liquid biopsies into routine practice, it is important to explore variables most likely to impact the functionality of CTCs including time to process the sample, prospective cryopreservation, blood collection tube and fixative reagents. Cell stabilizer tubes such as Streck Cell-Free DNA, CellSave, CellRescue, or PAXgene ccfDNA have been designed to prevent cell lysis and release of genomic DNA into the plasma, often observed in standard EDTA tubes. In pediatrics, we are often limited by the volume of blood we can draw for research. To this end, we have established an innovative pipeline to collect ctDNA, CTCs, and matched germline DNA from a single blood sample. Blood samples were processed for plasma extraction and CTC isolation after 4h, 24h, and 48h. We isolated rare CTCs from whole blood by combining peripheral blood cell depletion with antigen-based CTC identification. We then evaluated CTC recovery rate and cell membrane integrity (cell-membrane permeabilization) across all blood collection tubes by flow or mass cytometry. Additionally, we integrated whole transcriptome analysis of RNA transcripts in individually sorted CTCs. In this study, we detected similar levels of cell-free DNA, germline DNA and ctDNA in healthy donors and patient samples collected in the DNA stabilizer tubes up to 48h after blood collection. Surprisingly, frequent clotting was observed in the cell layer of samples collected in PAXgene tubes only 24h after blood collection, preventing further analysis of CTC quality in these tubes. At 4h, EDTA tubes and stabilizer tubes seem to perform similarly in preserving CTC integrity. However, at later timepoints, CTC recovery rate, RNA quality and cell membrane integrity were significantly higher in CellRescue tubes. Finally, we showed that CTC count, and RNA quality were slightly lower in patient samples enumerated after cryopreservation compared to the paired-samples processed the same day in both EDTA and cell-stabilizing tubes. In conclusion, we validated the CellRescue tubes as the best candidate to reduce cell lysis and protect against cell membrane permeabilization and mRNA degradation for up to 48 hours, allowing sample collection from multi-institutional studies. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to compare the key steps in handling blood samples and how this affects transcriptomic-based assay performance. Citation Format: Anne-Florence Blandin, Sarah Finstuen-Magro, Samuel Abbou, Kelly Klega, Alejandra E. Aguilar, Mohammad Tanhaemami, Maria Ana Isabel C. De Los Santos, Joadly Duplan, Brian Crompton. Evaluation of blood collection tube’s performance for analysis of liquid biopsies by flow and mass cytometry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1040.