Abstract 10206: Misleading Transvalvular Hemodynamics for Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Abstract

Introduction: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease that leads to cardiac remodeling. Appropriate management depends on accurate assessment of AS severity. Transvalvular gradients are central to echocardiographic assessment of AS though can be impacted by any conditions that decrease transvalvular flow. Hypothesis: 1) Decline in peak transvalvular gradient over time is associated with more significant cardiac remodeling and 2) Cardiac damage is associated with lower transvalvular flow and masks progression of AS. Methods: Retrospective single center study of patients with moderate AS (defined as peak gradient 25-40mmHg) from 2013-2020 with > 1 transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Each TTE was classified into established stages of cardiac damage: no damage (Stage 0), left ventricular damage (Stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (Stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (Stage 3), or right ventricular damage or subclinical heart failure (Stage 4). Results: Sixty patients with at least 1 follow-up TTE were included. The mean age was 73.5 +/- 11 years with 47% women (28/60) and median time of 381 days (IQR 12.7 months) between echocardiograms. On initial assessment, mean AVA and peak AV gradient were 1.2cm 2 +/- 0.33 and 37mmHg +/- 11.3 respectively. At follow-up, the mean AVA and peak AV gradient were 1.1cm 2 +/- 0.20 and 38mmHg +/- 12.6. Forty-three of 60 patients (72%) had evidence of cardiac damage on initial assessment compared to 55 of 60 patients (92%) on follow-up. Thirty-five (58%) patients displayed a decrease in peak AV gradient over time (average decrease -16% +/- 0.12). Twenty-one of the patients with declining peak gradients (60%) demonstrated progressive cardiac damage compared to 9 of 25 patients (36%) with increasing peak gradients (p= 0.06). Conclusions: Over half of patients with moderate AS demonstrated a decrease in peak AV gradient over time. Reliance on transvalvular gradients as a reflector of AS severity can be misleading as there was a trend toward more significant cardiac damage in this subset of patients. The presence of underlying cardiac damage can obscure traditional echocardiographic assessment and progression of AS and should be incorporated into assessments of disease severity and progression.