Abstract

Abstract Immunotherapy is a new pillar of cancer therapy. One theoretical advantage of immunotherapy of cancer is that effector cells induced at one site should be able to kill metastatic cancer cells in other sites or tissues. On the other hand, it has been recognized that each tissue has unique immune components that play critical roles in protection against pathogens. However, very little is known whether effector T cells induced against tumors in one tissue can work against the same tumors in other tissues. To address this question, we compared the effect of effector cells induced against the same tumor cells growing in either the skin or the lung by using CT26 murine tumor models. Rejection of s.c. CT26 tumors was achieved by pretreatment with anti-CD25, which blocks the function of Treg cells. Both CD4 and CD8 T cells were necessary for the protection. When anti-CD25-pretreated mice challenged with s.c. CT26 were simultaneously inoculated i.v. with CT26, they also rejected tumors in the lung, while anti-CD25-pretreated mice without s.c. CT26 did not. This observation suggested that T cell mediated anti-tumor protective immunity induced against s.c. tumors can also protect against lung metastases of the same tumors. In contrast to Treg depletion which allowed for the induction of protective immunity in the s.c. tumor model, NKT cell-deficiency in CD1d KO mice induced significant CD8 T cell-mediated protection against lung metastasis of CT26 but had no effect on the growth of s.c. CT26 tumors. When CD1d KO mice rejecting i.v. CT26 were simultaneously challenged with s.c. CT26, the development of s.c. tumors was not affected, indicating that tumor rejection induced against the CT26 in the lung did not confer protection for the same tumor cells in the skin. Since the protection against CT26 in the lung in CD1d KO mice is mediated by CD8 T cells, we transferred T cells from CD1d KO mice inoculated i.v. with CT26 into RAG1 KO recipients, and challenged the recipient mice with the CT26 tumor cells. The recipient RAG1 KO mice were highly resistant to CT26 inoculated i.v. but not s.c. confirming that the CD8 T cells protective in the lung are not protective in the skin. These data indicate the effector cells against the same tumor do not work in all tissues, and the induction site of the effector T cells is critical to control metastasis. Citation Format: Jessica J. O'Konek, Elena Ambrosino, Anja Bloom, Liat Izhak, Jay A. Berzofsky, Masaki Terabe. Directionality of T-cell-mediated cross-protection against the same tumor in lungs versus skin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1015. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1015

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call