Abstract 089: A Case of Complicated Dissection: Vertebral Artery Sacrifice for Recurrent Stroke Prevention

Abstract

Introduction Posterior circulation strokes account for 20% of ischemic strokes (1). Optimal management for posterior circulation strokes has been studied less than for anterior circulation strokes (2). Endovascular parent vessel sacrifice is an established technique used to treat vascular pathologies. There is limited evidence for parent artery sacrifice for recurrent strokes and there is no current guideline for standard of care. Methods '‐ Results 51‐year‐old gentleman with history of tobacco use presented with left homonymous hemianopsia, onset 1.5 hours prior to arrival. CT brain showed no bleed and patient received IV tissue‐plasminogen activator (tPA). CT angiography (CTA) demonstrated occlusion of the right posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and dissection of the left vertebral artery (V2 segment) with distal reconstitution. He underwent emergent thrombectomy for right P2 thrombus with complete reperfusion TICI 3 (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score). Less than 24 hours later, he developed a right homonymous hemianopsia, and was found to have a new occlusion of the left P1 segment of the left PCA. Emergent thrombectomy was performed with complete reperfusion (TICI3). MRI brain demonstrated bilateral PCA territory infarcts. Within 12 hours of the second thrombectomy, his neurological exam deteriorated, and interval imaging revealed a basilar trunk thrombus, for which he underwent a successful endovascular thrombectomy complete reperfusion (TICI3). His antiplatelet regimen was optimized with Aspirin. Heparin was considered as treatment but was not provided because of the hemorrhagic conversion of his ischemic strokes. Given the persistent recurrence of thromboemboli in the posterior circulation despite being on optimal medical management, and evidence of hemorrhagic conversion, a decision was made to perform endovascular coil embolization of the left vertebral artery V2 segment at the site of dissection. Angiographic imaging demonstrated antegrade blood flow through the dissection as the source of recurrent embolic strokes. Six Stryker Target coils were deployed spanning the region of dissection within the left V2 segment via a right radial access with the guide catheter in the right vertebral artery. Post coil embolization angiographic runs demonstrated complete occlusion of the left vertebral V2 segment at the region of dissection which was confirmed via a left vertebral injection from a left femoral arterial access. There was preservation of ascending cervical collaterals beyond the dissection with patency of the contralateral vertebral artery supplying the intracranial circulation. Following embolization, repeat imaging showed no new infarcts and no new or worsening hemorrhage. He was continued on Aspirin monotherapy. It is notable that though his neurological exam deteriorated during each recurrent thromboembolic event, his neurologic exam at the time of discharge significantly improved with NIHSS of 3. He is currently being followed at our neuroscience institute. Conclusion Cervical arterial dissections pose increased risk for ischemic strokes (3). Vertebral artery dissection accounts for approximately 2%, of which, 10‐25% occur in middle‐aged and younger patients (4). This is a case of a young patient that exemplifies a successful role for vertebral artery sacrifice with coil embolization to prevent recurrent thromboembolic posterior circulation strokes. However controlled studies are needed for safety and efficacy of these interventions.