Abstract
Introduction: Delays in door to groin puncture time (DGPT) for patients with ischemic stroke caused by acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) correlate with worse clinical outcomes. Stroke centers aim to minimize DGPT to facilitate prompt intervention and limit ischemic brain injury. In this study, we present the results of a comprehensive quality assessment at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD). From 2015 to 2016, institutional implementation of a quality improvement protocol significantly reduced DGPT. Materials and Methods: Beginning July 2015, the UCSD interdisciplinary stroke team implemented a series of quality improvement measures to decrease DGPT, with a target of 90 minutes or less. After each case, areas of inefficiency were identified and changes were implemented based on direct feedback from neurointerventional physicians and ancillary staff. Changes included: 1) creation of a pager group notification system to activate the entire neurointerventional team simultaneously, 2) consistently involving anesthesia with each neurointervention, 3) streamlining communication between the vascular neurology and neurointervention teams, and 4) structuring parallel workflows to enhance mobilization speed. R statistical software was utilized to compare DGPT before and after implementation of these process improvements. Patients were divided into three groups based on the date of their intervention as follows: 23 patients treated from July-December 2015, 24 patients treated from January-July 2016, and 14 patients treated from July 2016-December 2016. A multivariable univariate binary logistic regression model was constructed to capture predictors of compliance with our target DGPT (<90 min). Variables analyzed included: date of intervention, mode of patient admission (i.e. transfer, direct admit from ED, inpatient), hospital location, age, and gender. Results: 61 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute LVO from July 2015 to December 2016. In our analysis, date of intervention—as a proxy for implementation of process improvement protocols—and mode of admission were predictive of compliance with target DGPT. Patients who were treated from July 2016 to December 2016—after full implementation of process improvements— were 9.5 times more likely to meet or exceed the target DGPT compared to patients treated July 2015 to December 2015 (p=0.01). Additionally, arrival via transfer from an outside hospital was determined to be an independent predictor of meeting DGPT goals. (p=0.02). Conclusion: UCSD’s quality improvement process effected dramatic, statistically significant improvement in DGPT. This analysis demonstrates the utility of a formal quality improvement system at a large, academic comprehensive stroke center.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.