Abstract 028: Electronic Health Record Meaningful Use Did Not Improve Pay-for-Performance Outcomes

Abstract

Objective: With the goal of improving healthcare quality, Medicare has implemented a series of pay-for-performance initiatives and allocated substantial financial resources to promote meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). The purpose of this study was to examine whether hospitals achieving EHR meaningful use improved hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality (RSMR) and readmission (RSRR) rates used in Medicare pay-for-performance (P4P) initiatives. Methods: We used publically available data on Medicare EHR Incentive Program achievement (2014 to 2015) to categorize hospitals as achieving two years, one year, or no years of stage 2 meaningful use (i.e. comprehensive EHR) from 2014-2015. Using generalized linear models, we compared the change in publically reported 30-day RSMRs and RSRRs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and pneumonia (PN) from 2012 to 2016 by years of stage 2 meaningful use. Models were adjusted for hospital teaching status, system affiliation, ownership status, urban/rural location, bed size, and safety-net status obtained from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and Medicare Impact File (both 2009-2011). Results: From the 4,755 hospitals participating in the Medicare EHR program, 19.8% and 46.0% had two years and one year of stage 2 meaningful use, while 34.2% never achieved stage 2 meaningful use. The Figure shows that from 2012 to 2016 thirty-day mortality for AMI decreased (-1.2% to -1.4%), increased modestly for CHF (+0.5), and increased for PN (+4.1 to +4.6%). All thirty-day readmission rates decreased during this time, with decreases greater in AMI and CHF (both -2.7% to -2.8%) than in PN (-1.3% to -1.4%). We found that there were no significant differences in risk-standardized mortality or readmission rate changes by years of stage 2 meaningful use, even after adjusting for hospital characteristics (all comparisons p>0.05). Conclusions: While RSMRs and RSRRs have changed substantially from 2012 to 2016 for most conditions, changes were similar for hospitals with two years, one year, or no years of stage 2 EHR meaningful use. Our findings suggest that adoption of more comprehensive EHRs did not improve hospital P4P outcomes. Figure. Change in RSMRs and RSRRs rates by years of stage 2 meaningful use.