Abstract
AbstractBesides being the first five‐act tragedy on the English stage, Gorboduc was also the first play to depict usurpation, regicide, and rebellion, on the English stage – all of which became common plot devices in late‐sixteenth century English drama. By offering a reading of the play's treatment of absolutism – divorced from tyranny – manifesting itself in the decision upon the sovereign exception, this article will re‐evaluate the differences between early Tudor political moralities about tyranny and the late Elizabethan usurpation plays, and will ground the transition from one to the other in Gorboduc's engagement with radical innovations in dramaturgy and political thought. It will refer to contemporary political tracts as well as modern political theory, especially the legal fiction of the ‘king's two bodies’ which indirectly makes its presence felt in Gorboduc. Invoking Ernst Kantorowicz's theorization of the ‘king's two bodies’ and Carl Schmitt's theory of sovereignty as a critical framework, this article questions the relation of sovereign power to the person of the bearer, and problematizes the notion of monarchical absolutism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.