Abstract
The second-order nonlinear optical coefficients are essential material parameters that determine the performance of nonlinear optical devices. Unfortunately, however, there have been considerable discrepancies among their absolute values reported to date [1]. This confusion, we believe, arises from the following factors. First, quite different values have been reported between parametric fluorescence (PF) and second-harmonic generation (SHG) measurements; e.g., d31(LiIO3) measured by PF method is 70 % larger than by SHG method [2. 3]. Second, wavelength scaling of nonlinear optical coefficients has been made based on the constancy of Miller’s Δ, although it has not been experimentally confirmed in what wavelength region and to what accuracy Miller’s Δ is constant. Moreover, the interference effect caused by multiple reflection effect in (nearly) plane-parallel samples has been overlooked in almost all the previous measurements, which can be the source of considerable error.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.