Abstract

A total of 127 adult patients who had sustained an impact of significant mechanical energy to their skulls during motor vehicle incidents were given thorough neuropsychological, cognitive and personality assessments between 0.5 years and 4 years after the event. Cross-sectional analysis indicated no statistically significant objective changes in patients as a function of yearly intervals. However there was strong evidence of significant deterioration of neuropsychological proficiency and efficiency between 0.3 to 1.0 years after the injury. A subset (n = 20) of patients who displayed moderately severe neuropsychological impairment when assessed about 1 year after the injury showed no statistically significant changes when reassessed about 1.5 years later (2.5 years after the brain trauma). These results challenge the traditional concept of “recovery” following a traumatic brain injury and indicate that insidious processes that adversely affect neurocognitive capacity may emerge 0.5 years after the trauma. Post-hoc analysis indicated that the occurrence of unconsciousness or its duration at the time of the injury minimally affected the magnitude of subsequent indices of neuropsychological impairment but influenced the incidence of electroencephalographic theta activity during the years following the injury.

Highlights

  • During the months to years following a traumatic brain event many patients exhibit significant and self-evident changes in their neurocognitive capacities [1,2,3]

  • A total of 127 adult patients who had sustained an impact of significant mechanical energy to their skulls during motor vehicle incidents were given thorough neuropsychological, cognitive and personality assessments between 0.5 years and 4 years after the event

  • According to the Neuropsychologica Principia Brevita [1] contemporary medical and legal approaches to the actual neurophysical changes associated with the transfer of mechanical energy through the cerebral volume do not reflect the principles of neuroscience or the temporal complexity of human performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the months to years following a traumatic brain event (closed head injury) many patients exhibit significant and self-evident changes in their neurocognitive capacities [1,2,3]. The time required for the changes in standardized, norm-referenced performance based measurements of neuropsychological function to asymptote exhibits significant individual variability that is only weakly to moderately correlated with traditional variables such as scores for the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the duration of coma, or the interval of posttraumatic amnesia. Definitions of “mild traumatic brain injury”, such as: 1) cranial trauma, 2) loss of consciousness for 20 min or less, 3) GCS scores between 13 and 15 at the time of admission, 4) posttraumatic dysmnesia of less than 24 hr or 5) absence of CT-discernable anomalies are arbitrary and JBBS

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call