Abstract

Whether in the thermodynamic limit of lattice length L→∞, hole concentration mηz=−2Sηz/L=1−ne→0, nonzero temperature T>0, and U/t>0 the charge stiffness of the 1D Hubbard model with first neighbor transfer integral t and on-site repulsion U is finite or vanishes and thus whether there is or there is no ballistic charge transport, respectively, remains an unsolved and controversial issue, as different approaches yield contradictory results. (Here Sηz=−(L−Ne)/2 is the η-spin projection and ne=Ne/L the electronic density.) In this paper we provide an upper bound on the charge stiffness and show that (similarly as at zero temperature), for T>0 and U/t>0 it vanishes for mηz→0 within the canonical ensemble in the thermodynamic limit L→∞. Moreover, we show that at high temperature T→∞ the charge stiffness vanishes as well within the grand-canonical ensemble for L→∞ and chemical potential μ→μu where (μ−μu)≥0 and 2μu is the Mott–Hubbard gap. The lack of charge ballistic transport indicates that charge transport at finite temperatures is dominated by a diffusive contribution. Our scheme uses a suitable exact representation of the electrons in terms of rotated electrons for which the numbers of singly occupied and doubly occupied lattice sites are good quantum numbers for U/t>0. In contrast to often less controllable numerical studies, the use of such a representation reveals the carriers that couple to the charge probes and provides useful physical information on the microscopic processes behind the exotic charge transport properties of the 1D electronic correlated system under study.

Highlights

  • The most widely studied correlated electronic model on a lattice in one dimension (1D) is the Hubbard model with first neighbor transfer integral t and on-site repulsion U

  • At U = 0 the charge stiffness D(T ) of the 1D Hubbard model is a simple problem in terms of the non-interacting electron representation

  • D(T ) > 0 reaches a maximum value at T = 0, max D(T ) = D(0) = 2t/π, behaving for low and high temperature T as [D(0) − D(T )] ∝ T 2 > 0 and D(T ) ∝ 1/T, respectively. (The qualitative difference of the U = 0 and u > 0 physics and the related T > 0 transition that occurs at U = Uc = 0 is an issue discussed in Appendix B for mzη → 0 and mzη = 0 and in Appendix C for mzη ∈ [0, 1].)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most widely studied correlated electronic model on a lattice in one (spatial) dimension (1D) is the Hubbard model with first neighbor transfer integral t and on-site repulsion U. Given their simple and direct relation to the rotated-electrons charge and spin degrees of freedom, it allows a more clear physical description of the microscopic processes that control the charge properties under study This is consistent with each of the set of 4L energy and momentum eigenstates that span the model Hilbert space being generated from the electron and rotated-electron vacuum by occupancy configurations of the three types of fractionalized particles under consideration that are much simpler than those in terms of electrons. We rely on exact symmetry relations to express the charge currents of general energy and momentum eigenstates |lr, Lη, Sη, Sηz, u , Eq (13), in terms of that of the corresponding η-Bethe state |lr, Lη, Sη, −Sη, u on the right-hand side of that equation.

Effects of the symmetry on the charge degrees of freedom
The rotated-electron degrees of freedom separation
Relation to the Bethe-ansatz solution quantum numbers
Charge current operator expectation values and useful subspaces
Three exact properties of the charge current operator expectation values
Useful current absolute values upper bounds
Compact c and αn bands occupancy configurations
The reference subspaces largest charge current absolute value
The SzS subspaces largest charge current absolute value
Charge stiffness upper bounds within the canonical ensemble
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call