Abrupt vs. gradual visual onsets in go/no-go sustained attention tasks.

Abstract

Two experiments compared both average performance and changes in performance across time in abrupt- and gradual-onset sustained attention tasks. Experiment1 compared abrupt- and gradual-onset digits. In conditions where the digits onset and offset abruptly and appeared only briefly, similar to typical conditions in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), participants committed more errors on no-go trials and responded faster overall, indicative of a shift in the speed/accuracy tradeoff toward speed. When the digits abruptly onset but remained on-screen for a longer period of time, there were no differences in no-go error rates, hit rates, or reaction time (RT) variability, but participants still emitted faster RTs overall. Experiment2 compared abrupt- and gradual-onset images. Similar to Experiment1, abrupt-onset, short-duration images induced more no-go errors and faster RTs, but also more RT variability and reduced hit rates. In the abrupt-onset, long-duration condition, again the only performance difference was a decrease in average RTs. We discuss implications for using these two types of tasks in sustained attention research.