Abstract

INTRODUCTIONThis study aimed to explore the efficacy of abrupt and gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy.METHODSA total of 278 smokers who experienced moderate-to-severe nicotine dependence and visited a Chinese smoking cessation outpatient clinic from March 2017 to February 2021 were enrolled. This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Participants were divided into two groups by the cessation strategy they received: the abrupt cessation group (n=139, tobacco was not controlled during the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was entirely discontinued on the 22nd day) and the gradual cessation group (n=139, tobacco was gradually reduced in the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was discontinued on the 22nd day). The abstinence rates were compared between groups (7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment; and 1-month and 3-month continuous abstinence rates of 6-month follow-up). Possible factors that influence efficacy, reasons for smoking cessation failure, and associated adverse events were also analyzed.RESULTSNo significant difference in the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). The 1-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (51.1% vs 31.7%; χ2=10.812, p=0.001). The 3-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was also higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (42.4% vs 27.3%; χ2=6.983, p=0.008). Abrupt cessation was a risk factor for successful smoking cessation than gradual cessation (AOR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.15–3.85, p=0.013),the motivation of ‘prevention and treatment of own diseases’ reduced the risk of incomplete abstinence (AOR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.38–0.99, p=0.049). The incidence of adverse events was higher in the abrupt cessation group than in the gradual cessation group. The incidence rates of nausea and insomnia were statistically significant differences.CONCLUSIONSCompared with abrupt cessation, gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy produced higher abstinence rates and relatively milder withdrawal symptoms.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to explore the efficacy of abrupt and gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy

  • No significant difference was observed in terms of age, number of cigarettes smoked daily, FTND score, gender, employment status, motivation to quit, level of education, underlying diseases, and FeCO at the first outpatient visit between the abrupt cessation group and the gradual cessation group (p>0.05 for all indicators) (Table 1)

  • Comparison of abstinence rates between the two groups The 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates of the gradual cessation group at 1, 3 and 6 months posttreatment were 54.0%, 41.7%, and 53.2%, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference when compared with the abrupt cessation group (50.4%, 45.3%, and 41.7%; χ2=0.360, 0.366, and 3.693, p>0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of abrupt and gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy. METHODS A total of 278 smokers who experienced moderate-to-severe nicotine dependence and visited a Chinese smoking cessation outpatient clinic from March 2017 to February 2021 were enrolled This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Most previous studies[8] focused on the comparison of abstinence rates between the two cessation strategies in nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)-aided smoking cessation and further rFeigsuerea1r.cShtudoynflotwhdeiagarbamstinence rates produced by the two cessation methods in varenicline tartrate-aided smoking cessation is needed In this retrospective study, we enrolled smokers who underwent varenicline-aided cessation treatment, categorized the enrolled cases into the gradual cessation group and the abrupt cessation group, and defined the cessation treatment course as 3 weeks[6,7] based on relevant studies and clinical practice. The abstinence rates of the two groups, relevant contributing factors, reasons for smoking cessation failure, and the adverse events were discussed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call