Abstract

PurposeThe recent restructuring of the ABR core examination has prompted changes to radiology residency training. The purpose of this study is to determine how factors related to the core examination restructuring influenced radiology applicants’ match decisions. MethodsWe surveyed 626 applicants to our institution’s radiology residency, after the 2014 match. Applicants rated 21 factors on a 5-point scale. Eight of the factors pertained to the core examination. The respondents additionally listed the top three factors in order of importance. ResultsThe response rate was 153 of 626 (24.4%). The three most influential factors were current resident satisfaction (average score: 4.74 of 5.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.64-4.83]), quality of faculty (4.63 [95% CI = 4.52-4.73]) and quality of educational curriculum and clinical training (4.60 [95% CI = 4.50-4.70]). Of factors related to the core examination, the highest rated were core examination pass rate (4.21 [95% CI = 4.07-4.35]) and program resources/time off for external review courses (3.92 [95% CI = 3.79-4.04]). Core examination pass rate (16 of 459 [3.5%]) and time off from clinical duties to study for the examination (6 of 459 [1.3%]) appeared infrequently in respondents’ lists of the top three most influential factors. ConclusionsFactors influencing candidates’ choice of radiology program are similar to those reported previously, despite the addition of topics related to core examination restructuring. Although programs vary in how they have addressed the changes, these issues are less important to candidates than are more traditional factors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.