Abstract
As quantum physics nowadays tries to reframe and explain electric and magnetic field phenomena, we must not be mislead over the fact that quantum physics remains a stepdaughter of field physics based solely on postulates until eventually it will have found a way to calculate its quanta. Furthermore, field physics is at least 25 times older and can be traced back all the way to the early Greek natural philosophers. Vortex physics is another offspring of field physics, however, it has been systematically rejected by quantum physics. Which in turn often times has a lot to do with politics and not always with science. It could in fact be the case that vortex physics has been suppressed by its own sister, ever since it also has produced distinguished representatives. A mathematical derivation shows that the currently known formulas and laws of electrodynamics are incomplete and insufficient in describing all its associated phenomena. Via a new formulation and extension of Maxwell's equation it becomes possible to calculate a potential vortex, its effect on the dielectric medium can be measured and its existence made evident through observable natural phenomena.
Highlights
In order for these preliminary statements not to contradict known general conclusions, they have to include the following, vortices occurring in nature or technology as a matter of principal cannot be calculated or measured and in general are not visible
Calculating a vortex strictly speaking already stalls with the attempt of forming a field equation that is able to determine its dimensions in space and time
The well-known current vortex occurs in the conductor, whereas its counterpart, the potential vortex, forms in the poor-conducting medium, with preference in the dielectric
Summary
In order for these preliminary statements not to contradict known general conclusions, they have to include the following, vortices occurring in nature or technology as a matter of principal cannot be calculated or measured and in general are not visible They are there for out of reach of our precise scientific methods, which seems to make it practically impossible to prove their existence. Rather a lack of uniformity, linearity and specific material properties would in this case be accepted as an explanation from a scientific point of view, the actual causal, but not measurable eddy currents. This analogy ought to make us reconsider. A mathematical description of the vortex through an appropriate field equation can be deemed satisfactory, from a precise scientific view point
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
