Abstract

Purpose . The problem qualitative assessment of technologies and innovations, which cannot be solved without modern methods and decision support systems, is currently particularly relevant. The reason for this is the increasingly increasing amount of heterogeneous information, which should take into account the decision maker. Reduction of the allowable period of decision-making also has a signifi cant impact on this process. These reasons are refl ected in the problems of network-centric warfare, nuclear management, forecasting, and conceptual design. It actualizes the problem of the synthesis of new methods of decision-making that will effectively solve the problem of choice of alternatives in those problem areas where the application of existing methods of decision-making is unfounded or inadmissible. The complexity of the process of creation of new decision-making methods caused by the high degree of utilization of cognitive processes. In accordance with the system-wide development trends the designer in the process of synthesis of the decision-makings should take a system (or group of systems) which implements certain cognitive operations. The first step towards the creation of such a group of systems is the development of methodology of the system synthesis of decision-makings. Materials and methods. The scope of research are approaches to the synthesis of systems, and in particular – the synthesis of decision-makings. On the basis of multidimensional analysis and generalization of approach the methodology was developed, which consists of the main stages - goal setting, goal achievement and variations of the target system. Within each of the stages a wide variation of operations is possible to be used, which applied depending on the available data, obtained from the analysis of the subject area. With the use of the methodology obtained a number of decision-making methods, and their creation was carried out without the use of computer equipment, which require signifi cant time expenses on the development of appropriate solutions. Therefore, it was decided to develop an automated system to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of a number of methodology procedures. Results. During the study were identifi ed use cases of the system, in accordance with which were formed the conceptual and technical architecture of the system, highlights the key subsystems of the reference data, knowledge about the methods of decision-making and synthesis strategies, and identifi es their development tools. As the database used by the DBMS MS SQL Server, as the client side – Borland Delphi. Conclusion. Due to the high complexity of formalization of intellectual, creative, methodologies operations, the focus of automation is the support of conceptual analysis of the decisionmakings subject area and formation on its basis the knowledge base of intellectual operations together with their characteristic features, aimed to combine operations that make up the group of methods of synthesis strategies decision-making and implementation of the search function on the basis of a intellectual operations knowledge base.

Highlights

  • The problem qualitative assessment of technologies and innovations, which cannot be solved without modern methods and decision support systems, is currently relevant

  • Reduction of the allowable period of decision-making has a significant impact on this process. These reasons are reflected in the problems of network-centric warfare, nuclear management, forecasting, and conceptual design. It actualizes the problem of the synthesis of new methods of decision-making that will effectively solve the problem of choice of alternatives in those problem areas where the application of existing methods of decision-making is unfounded or inadmissible

  • In accordance with the system-wide development trends the designer in the process of synthesis of the decision-makings should take a system which implements certain cognitive operations

Read more

Summary

ПЗ ФЭС

Формацией для группы этапов ЦП является информация, описывающая проблему – несоответствие структуры/функционала МПР состоянию среды принятия решений. Целью синтеза может являться расширение области применимости существующих МПР, устранение имеющихся недостатков, приспособление к новым условиям среды принятия решений. Ниже описаны некоторые из вариантов стратегий, которые были использованы при создании МПР. Для использования данного подхода необходимо основе анализа МПР выявить тенденции их развития, записать выявленные тенденции в виде последовательности изменения значений признаков фактор-группы и определить целевое состояние в соответствии с выявленными тенденциями развития. Формирование базы синтеза (БС) представляет собой процесс, в ходе которого выбираются элементы, составляющие основу синтезируемой целевой системы. Ниже приведены некоторые из способов формирования БС, которые были использованы при создании МПР: 1. Формирование БС при помощи сочетания соседних элементов целевой ячейки поля знаний. Этап «Вариация целевого МПР» В общем случае, результатом процесса синтеза является не только целевой МПР, реализующий заданные требования, но и совокупность конструктивных элементов, методов разрешения противоречий и др. Приведенные примеры использования методологии были выполнены авторами в ходе ког-

Задание условий синтеза
Синтез метода синтеза и неавтоматизированный синтез МПР
Подсистем синтеза методов получения МПР
Соответствует тенденции формализации процесса синтеза за MS SQL Server 2012
Системный анализ и принятие решений: Словарьсправочник
Sistemnyi analiz i prinyatie reshenii: Slovar’spravochnik
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.