Abstract
The study concerns one of the important, though not very intensively discussed in literature issues related to the tacit confirmation. Meanwhile, the unprecedented, dualistic character of the decision issued with the tacit confirmation, prompts to pose a number of questions regarding both its essence and the consequences of introducing this type of construction into the legal system. The observations made can be a good opportunity to open a discussion on the evolution of the administrative procedure and its adaptation to the social and political circumstances.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
