Abstract
Facial prominence, defined as the relative proportion of a visual depiction of a person devoted to portrayal of the head vs. the rest of the body, has been interpreted as an indicator of power or dominance. An archival study examined the facial prominence of a single political target, George W. Bush, in political cartoons as a function of involvement in war. For two different wars, results revealed lower facial prominence in the portrayal of the target after the onset of war. These results were not a function of the topic of the cartoon and could not be explained by intentional efforts to derogate the target. The portrayal of a political leader as less powerful and less dominant after involvement in war is inconsistent with predictions for facial prominence effects. The implications of these paradoxical results for the study of facial prominence in media portrayals of political leaders are considered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
