Abstract
This article describes the politics of abortion during the Howard years (1996–2007) as a time of significant turbulence. It considers four separate significant developments in abortion discourse in the actions of federal and state governments and parliaments and in the publication of an influential anti-abortion text. It argues that while support for women's choice as a framework for understanding abortion prevailed during the Howard years, the definition of what an abortion is changed significantly towards an experience that is contrary to, rather than consistent with, women's health and well-being. This shift is attributed to the Howard government, the most pro-actively anti-abortion federal government since the early 1970s, and broader white patriarchal discourses of gender that elevated maternity as a moral imperative for women and constructed abortion as a harm.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
