Abstract
Family separation is a defining feature of the U.S. government’s policy to forcibly assimilate and dismantle American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) tribal nations. The historical record catalogues the violence of this separation in several ways, including the mass displacement of Native children into boarding schools throughout the 19th century and the widespread adoption of Native children into non-Native homes in the 20th century. This legacy eventually prompted the passage of landmark legislation known as the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA). ICWA introduced federal protections against the unnecessary removal of Native children and affirmed the role of the tribe as an important partner in child welfare proceedings. To what extent has the federal government honored the commitments of ICWA and reversed the trajectory of Native family separation since 1978? What can be done to reduce the threat of the current child welfare system on the well-being of Native families?
 In this Article, we use administrative and historical data to statistically evaluate the magnitude of change in AIAN family separation since the passage of ICWA and locate the institutional pathways that funnel AIAN families into the child welfare system. We find that, despite long-standing treaty responsibilities to support the health and well-being of tribal nations, AIAN children remain at incredibly high risk of family separation. In particular, we find that the frequency of AIAN children’s placement into foster care has remained relatively stable since the passage of ICWA and that the post-investigation removal decision by child welfare agencies is a key mechanism of inequality in family separation. We situate these findings within theories about settler colonialism and Indigenous dispossession to illustrate that the continuous removal of Native children from their homes is not an anomaly. Instead, we argue that the very intent of a white supremacist settler-state is to dismantle Native communities. Based upon these findings, we argue that the child welfare system in its entirety must be abolished in order to stop the routine surveillance and separation of Native and nonWhite children from their families by the state. We suggest that ICWA has provided, and will continue to provide, a necessary intervention to protect Native families so long as this intrusive system remains. We conclude by envisioning an abolitionist approach that immediately redirects social and financial resources into the hands of Native families and works cooperatively with tribal nations to promote Indigenous communities of care.
Highlights
The enduring effects of the settler-state’s targeted control of non-white families cannot be understated
We find that the frequency of AIAN children’s placement into foster care has remained relatively stable since the passage of Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and that the post-investigation removal decision by child welfare agencies is a key mechanism of inequality in family separation
We argue that the child welfare system in its entirety must be abolished in order to stop the routine surveillance and separation of Native and nonWhite children from their families by the state
Summary
The enduring effects of the settler-state’s targeted control of non-white families cannot be understated. The child welfare system represents an early yet potent mechanism to reproduce the intentions of a white supremacist settler-state, namely the desire to displace and erase Native and non-white families that resist the settler project Throughout this Article, we argue that family separation constitutes a defining and continuing feature of the relationship between the U.S government and American Indian tribal nations. In the case of Native Peoples, this requires a moral reckoning of the state’s allegiance to white supremacy and subsequent attempts to assimilate away the livelihood, values, and kin networks of Indigenous Peoples This approach would redirect social and financial [Vol 11:533 resources into the hands of Native families and work cooperatively with tribal nations to promote Indigenous communities of care, as defined by tribal nations. We urge lawmakers to transfer federal funds, made available through Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, directly to Native families who can provide for children in ways that align with their cultural practices and vision for intergenerational healing
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.