Abstract
The current state practices and the role of the United Nations and other regional organisations clearly advocate the abolition of death penalty. The abolitionist movement is strengthening without giving due attention to the nature, seriousness, or brutality, of crime. They believe that death penalty is brutal, cruel, immoral, unreasonable, oppose to the sanctity of life and it involves the risk of innocent execution. They further believe that since, it does not have any differential deterrent effect life imprisonment is sufficient. Throughout the article an attempt has been made to evaluate and ascertain the strength of these allegations. In-depth study and research on the respective grounds of allegation reveals that these grounds are, no way, strong and relevant enough to justify the position of the abolitionists; rather the reality deserves that the death penalty should not be abolished for all kinds of crime.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
