Abstract
The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) phase III certification examination was originally constructed and recently modified to "help the Board determine the candidate's knowledge of clinical orthodontics and provide a basis to assess the quality of the candidate's clinical treatment results." For the most part, the ABO phase III examination measures the orthodontic treatment-induced changes in occlusion in a limited and biased patient sample. The process and outcome measures used in the current model-the discrepancy index and the objective grading system-are so narrowly focused that an orthodontist might lack up-to-date clinical knowledge, psychomotor and critical thinking skills, diagnostic acumen, patient management ability, and patient-centered ethics, and still pass the examination largely because of mechanically morphing the patient's teeth into the board's construct of ideal occlusion. The goal of this article is to provide provocative insight into the core concepts that drive the ABO phase III certification process and to recommend an alternative paradigm predicated on a patient-centered, evidence-based clinical practice model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
