Abstract
The Raman peak position shift rate per strain (RSS) coefficient of graphene is crucial for quantitative strain measurement by Raman spectroscopy. Despite its essential role, the experimentally measured RSS values are found to be highly scattered and many times significantly lower than the theoretical prediction. Here, using in situ Raman spectroscopy with a tensile test system, we resolve this controversy by examining the Raman characteristics of graphene derived from chemical vapor deposition (CVD) transferred on polymer substrates. Our experiments show that the Raman 2D-peak position of CVD graphene can shift nonlinearly with applied strain, in contrast to its intrinsically linear trait. More importantly, the resultant RSS coefficient at the steady state is much lower than the theoretical prediction. By analyzing atomic force microscopy (AFM) phase images and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of Raman spectra, we attribute the abnormal behavior to nanometer-scale inhomogeneity of the graphene/substrate contact interface. Assisted by a simplified discrete interface slip model, we correlate the evolution of nanometer-scale inhomogeneity with that of the apparent Raman response. The theoretical model provides a useful tool for understanding and optimizing the contact interface behavior of various two-dimensional materials on substrates; the revealed mechanism is critical for correct interpretation of data obtained by Raman or any other spectroscopies based on homogenized laser signals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.