Abstract

Temporal Binding Window (TBW) represents a reliable index of efficient multisensory integration process, which allows individuals to infer which sensory inputs from different modalities pertain to the same event. TBW alterations have been reported in some neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders and seem to negatively affects cognition and behavior. So far, it is still unknown whether deficits of multisensory integration, as indexed by an abnormal TBW, are present even in Multiple Sclerosis. We addressed this issue by testing 25 participants affected by relapsing–remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) and 30 age-matched healthy controls. Participants completed a simultaneity judgment task (SJ2) to assess the audio-visual TBW; two unimodal SJ2 versions were used as control tasks. Individuals with RRMS showed an enlarged audio-visual TBW (width range = from − 166 ms to + 198 ms), as compared to healthy controls (width range = − 177/ + 66 ms), thus showing an increased tendency to integrate temporally asynchronous visual and auditory stimuli. Instead, simultaneity perception of unimodal (visual or auditory) events overall did not differ from that of controls. These results provide first evidence of a selective deficit of multisensory integration in individuals affected by RRMS, besides the well-known motor and cognitive impairments. The reduced multisensory temporal acuity is likely caused by a disruption of the neural interplay between different sensory systems caused by multiple sclerosis.

Highlights

  • Multisensory integration reflects the ability of synthetizing information from different senses (Bolognini et al 2013), a function that is based on dedicated cortical and subcortical neural mechanisms (Driver and Noesselt 2008; Stein and Meredith 1993)

  • For participants affected by relapsing–remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), Temporal Binding Window (TBW) values were normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test, p = 0.28), while TBW values violated normality in the control group (Shapiro–Wilk test, p = 0.002); these data were log-transformed to obtain a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test, p = 0.55)

  • Overall, fitting results documented an asymmetrically enlargement of the multisensory TBW in participants with RRMS, as compared to healthy controls

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multisensory integration reflects the ability of synthetizing information from different senses (Bolognini et al 2013), a function that is based on dedicated cortical and subcortical neural mechanisms (Driver and Noesselt 2008; Stein and Meredith 1993). Multisensory integration is inherently adaptive, optimizing perception, action and cognition (Driver and Noesselt 2008; Stein and Meredith 1993). Experimental Brain Research of multisensory integration is its reliance on temporal factors, whereby sensory stimuli occurring in closed temporal proximity interact at the neural level, enhancing neuronal responses (Bolognini et al 2005a; Stein and Meredith 1993). The multisensory TBW represents an important component of our perceptual experiences, allowing statistical inferences about the likelihood that multisensory stimuli originate from the same event (Wallace and Stevenson 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call