Abnormal functional activation during response inhibition in mild cognitive impairment: an fMRI study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDeclines in response inhibition are observed both typical and atypical aging, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Increased functional activation in frontoparietal regions during response inhibition has been interpreted to represent the emergence of a compensatory mechanism in older adulthood. While electrophysiology studies suggest the decline in response inhibition in MCI reflects a similar but amplified process as seen in normal aging this has not been examined thoroughly using functional MRI (fMRI).Methods31 cognitively normal older adults (M age = 73.6, 9 male) and 22 adult patients with MCI (M age = 67.2, 14 male) performed a Go/NoGo task during an fMRI scan. Group differences in accuracy and reaction time were examined for Go and NoGo trials. Individual BOLD signal change during task fMRI was examined, then voxel‐wise group comparison was conducted for MCI vs. HC groups, using age, gender, education, and gray matter density as covariates. Permutation‐estimated cluster size at alpha <.05 was defined to correct for errors of multiple comparisons.ResultsBehaviorally, the MCI group made significantly more errors during NoGo and Go trials (p<.001, p = .032, respectively), however, average reaction time did not differ significantly between groups. During NoGo trials, greater activation in the anterior default mode network (DMN), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and motor areas was observed for MCI vs. HC, while during go trials, there was greater activation in DMN and right insula (corrected p<0.05). However, when Go vs. NoGo trials were examined, MCI showed more activation in right insula and DLPFC, but less activation in the motor area at trend level (p<0.05, uncorrected). While, there were no significant task performance differences between MCI subtypes (amnestic vs. non‐amnestic), amnestic MCI (aMCI) showed more activation in posterior DMN and dorsal attention area during NoGo trials (corrected p<0.05).ConclusionMCI demonstrated significantly greater activation during both Go and NoGo trials and made significantly more errors in performance during both trial types as well. While the MCI subtypes did not exhibit differences in performance on the task, the aMCI exhibited significantly greater activation in multiple regions. Our findings suggested inefficient DMN suppression during task performance in the MCI cohort, especially in the aMCI subgroup.