Abstract

Authigenic seafloor carbonate crusts include fenestrate microbialite, thrombolite, and four types here designated Fine-grained Crust, Sparry Crust, Hybrid Sparry Fine-grained Crust, and Sparry Crust plus Coarse Grains. Each of the latter four types includes at least some layered examples that have generally been regarded as stromatolites. Recognition and interpretation of these various deposits assists understanding of stromatolite development. Sparry Crust is common in the Late Archaean-Mesoproterozoic. It includes botryoidal fans and other crystal pseudomorphs, microdigitate stromatolite, dendrite, isopachous laminite, and herringbone calcite. Although differing in primary mineralogy and bedform, these are all characterized by coarse sparry, commonly radial fibrous, fabric and appear light coloured in thin-section. They have commonly been referred to as seafloor cement, although they formed at the open sediment-water interface rather than as void-fills. Two of them in particular, isopachous laminite and microdigitate ‘tufa’, typically form isopachous layers with good vertical inheritance and have been regarded as stromatolites. In contrast to Sparry Crust, Fine-grained Crust has fine-grained (micritic, clotted, peloidal, filamentous) microfabric that appears dark in thin-section, and irregular uneven layering with relatively poor inheritance. Mixed crusts, composed of millimetric alternations of Sparry and Fine-grained crust, are here termed Hybrid Sparry Fine-grained Crust. Sparry Crust with coarse allochthonous grains - here termed Sparry Crust plus Coarse Grains – includes some examples that have been given formal stromatolite names, e.g., Gongylina and Omachtenia. Sparry, Hybrid, and Fine-grained crusts are common components of Precambrian stromatolites. Their relative abundances change through time. Archaean stromatolite fabrics are commonly obscured by recrystallization, but their preserved lamina arrangements suggest that many of them could be composed mainly of Sparry or Hybrid crust. During the Palaeoproterozoic-Mesoproterozoic, Sparry Crust fabrics were common in peritidal stromatolites, whereas Hybrid Crust appears to have dominated large subtidal domes and columns. Fine-grained Crust may not have become generally abundant until the Neoproterozoic, when it commonly formed both stromatolites and thrombolites. Phanerozoic normal marine stromatolites are also typically composed of Fine-grained Crust. Present-day analogues of Sparry Crust fabrics occur in some speleothem, hot spring, and splash-zone marine crusts, and of Fine-grained Crust in lithified microbial mats. Light-dark millimetric alternations of sparry and fine-grained crust that characterize Hybrid Crust have analogues in freshwater stromatolites. Taken together, these comparisons suggest that some Precambrian stromatolites are abiogenic, some microbial, and others are intimate hybrid mixtures of the two, and that - preservation permitting - these varieties can be distinguished using microfabric and lamina criteria.

Highlights

  • Stromatolites (KALKOWSKY, 1908) are often carbonate in composition and characteristically exhibit decimetric domical and columnar morphologies (HOFMANN, 1969)

  • Uncertainty about KALKOWSKY’s (1908) view of stromatolites has been created by a definition made by KRUMBEIN (1983, p. 499) and wrongly attributed to Kalkowsky: “stromatolites are organogenic, laminated, calcareous rock structures, the origin of which is clearly related to microscopic life, which in itself must not be fossilised”

  • Well-developed relatively even lamination described from the Neoarchaean Campbellrand-Malmani platform of South Africa as Boetsap lamination (SUMNER & GROTZINGER, 2004) represent a type of Hybrid Sparry-Microcrystalline Crust, but is difficult to interpret due to uncertainty regarding the origin of the layers, which appear to be entirely microspar, with no sign of clotted or peloidal fabric

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Stromatolites (KALKOWSKY, 1908) are often carbonate in composition and characteristically exhibit decimetric domical and columnar morphologies (HOFMANN, 1969). During the century since KALKOWSKY (1908) introduced the term “stromatolith” (stromatolite), particular problems have centred on confident discrimination between lithified microbial mats and a variety of other geological deposits that can have broadly similar appearances, such as invertebrate skeletons, diagenetic concretions, deformation structures, and sub-aqueous abiogenic precipitates. The variety of these difficulties has been reduced as understanding of fossils and carbonate sediments has progressed. As a result, GROTZINGER & JAMES (2000, p. 7) were able to summarize Precambrian marine “abiotic precipitates” as: (i) decimetric to metric radial fans (after aragonite), (ii) microdigitate stromatolites, (iii) isopachous millimetric laminites, (iv) isopachous layers of herringbone calcite, and (v) dendrites (“dendritic tufa”). GROTZINGER & KNOLL (1999, p. 329– 330) cited “petrographic evidence for early lithification, and for direct growth of encrusting marine cement directly on the growing stromatolite, for stromatolites of Mesoproterozoic and older ages”

PRECAMBRIAN CARBONATE CRUSTS
Fine-grained Crust
Botryoidal fans and crystal pseudomorphs
Microdigitate stromatolites and dendrite
Isopachous Laminite
Hybrid Sparry Fine-grained Crust
Clotted-bushy-peloidal micrite
Filamentous
Boetsap laminae: microspar crusts
Sparry Crust plus Coarse Grains
Herringbone Calcite with coarse grains
Fenestrate Microbialite
Thrombolite
PRESENT-DAY ANALOGUES
Fine-grained Crusts
Sparry Crusts
Hybrid Crusts
Fenestrate microbialite
RECOGNITION AND INTERPRETATION OF PRECAMBRIAN STROMATOLITIC CRUSTS
GIANT STROMATOLITES
NATURE OF ARCHAEAN STROMATOLITES
Findings
SECULAR CHANGES AND CONTROLS
SUMMARY

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.