Abstract
The applicability of the Fry method to marker distributions deformed by pressure-solution is examined. Four types of pressure-solution deformation were modeled. They differ by the spacing of the dissolution surfaces relative to the distance between marker centers, the amount of volume loss, and whether or not markers in contact with dissolution surfaces are dissolved completely. The results show that the Fry method correctly characterizes each type of deformation, but without additional information, such as the amount of volume loss, it can be used only where the deformation is constant volume and where dissolution surfaces are more closely spaced than marker centers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
