Abstract
Intermittent androgen suppression is becoming a standard clinical option for patients who suffer from recurrence after an initial treatment of prostate cancer such as radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy. In the first mathematical model of intermittent androgen suppression (Ideta et al., 2008), the authors tried to control the trajectory of the model to a periodic orbit to enable patients to coexist with prostate cancer, even if it cannot be eradicated. Recently, we proposed a mathematical model capable of improving the quantitative reproduction of the behavior of prostate cancer under intermittent androgen suppression (Hirata et al., 2010a). Here we examine whether such a stable periodic orbit can be created for patients who eventually will have to experience the relapse of cancer at a later stage. By using a mathematical analysis, we found that the above model of Hirata et al. does not contain a non-zero periodic orbit that can be targeted for such patients, namely patients of type (ii) or type (iii) for whom intermittent androgen suppression cannot stabilize the origin where no cancer cells exist. This result might suggest that the patients must seek to delay the relapse as much as possible if the cancer cannot be eradicated. We further classify type (i) into subclasses where such a non-zero periodic orbit can either be stabilized or asymptotically stabilized.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.